Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
A New York Probate Lawyer said that in 1943, four years after the brother executed the will; the New York trustee of the Foster trust was served by the Alien Property Custodian with Vesting Order which vested in the United States Government the entire interest of the brother and his next of kin in the trust. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:51 am
Flowers, 547 US 220 the United States Supreme Court held that when the government becomes aware that its attempt at notice has failed, due process requires the government to "take additional reasonable steps to attempt to provide notice to the property owner before selling his property, if it is practicable to do so. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
For purposes of this appeal, the property of the non-U.S. sovereign that is subject to execution must satisfy either the “waiver” or “commercial activity” exceptions and “must not only be (1) used generally for commercial activity in the United States, but it must also be (2) subject to a waiver of immunity, or (b) used for the specific commercial activity upon which the underlying claim was based”. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:33 am
Flowers, 547 US 220 the United States Supreme Court held that when the government becomes aware that its attempt at notice has failed, due process requires the government to "take additional reasonable steps to attempt to provide notice to the property owner before selling his property, if it is practicable to do so. [read post]
31 May 2020, 12:05 pm
Wadhwani’s practice covers the United States and Consulates worldwide. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:58 pm
The plaintiffs are attempting to allege that Rabobank used exclusive dealing arrangements—with more than 50 percent of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustees in the United States—to eliminate the bank’s need to compete for over a billion dollars of banking deposits of Chapter 7 estates. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases in which patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am
” Elsewhere, ACSblog has an interview with Joseph Sandler, an election law expert, in which he discusses the impact of Citizens United. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
New York State Elec. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm
State, 2010 Fla. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
This holds true, in particular, for the Patents Court of the United Kingdom, the German Bundesgerichtshof and the German Bundesverfassungsgericht [i.e. the Federal Constitutional Court], the case law of which is invoked repeatedly by the petitioners. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 1:55 pm
In Texas League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm
United States Monday, December 4 Christie v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:49 am
Briggs and United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
The principles laid down by the United States Supreme Court such as "suspect legislation", "strict scrutiny" and "compelling State necessity" are not applicable for challenging the validity of Act 5 of 2007 or reservations or other affirmative action contemplated under Article 15(5) of the Constitution.Pasayat J:132. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
And members of the Supreme Court of the United States have expressed similar concerns in defending that Court’s continuing policy excluding cameras. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
"*** The Appellate Division said that one of the Petitioners had "made clear in her letter of resignation, she had an agreement with [the District] that she would receive the retroactive [salary] payment while retaining the [health insurance] benefits of the old CBA. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
"*** The Appellate Division said that one of the Petitioners had "made clear in her letter of resignation, she had an agreement with [the District] that she would receive the retroactive [salary] payment while retaining the [health insurance] benefits of the old CBA. [read post]
