Search for: "True v True"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 33,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 4:27 pm
But this is not true now – many Americans are stuck in echo chambers where they are fed a steady diet of propaganda and disinformation. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:36 pm
" Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
I have been writing about the fundamental shift in the focus of human rights and human rights discourse, from one framed in the discursive tropes of liberal democratic ideology to one framed in an emerging Marxist-Leninist discourse (Backer, Larry Catá, ‘By Dred Things I am Compelled’: China and the Challenge to International Human Rights Law and Policy (January 15, 2020). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 7:33 am
Such a finding will not be reported and remains confidential, and often any Division records regarding the allegation and investigation will be eligible to be expunged after three years (understand this is not always true). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 5:36 am
In Kimble v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
The upshot of the three cases — Centro Empresarial v America Movil, Arfa v Zamir, and Pappas v Tzolis — is that it depends not only on the particular language of the waiver or release but also on the sophistication of the complaining party and whether, at the time of the transaction, the complaining party had reason to distrust the other party such that it could not reasonably rely on the latter’s representations. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Sock It To Me, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 8:28 pm
This held true even for those who lost their jobs due to the 2008 recession, for most of the participants involved. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:20 pm
But the court goes out of its way to make this point as a holding, not just a conceded point that it assumes to be true. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm
Dept. of Ins. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am
Rwanda’s Interference with Defence Investigations and Witness Appearances It is important to read the Trial Chamber’s section in the Simba Judgment, at paras. 41-53.[1] And, it is crucial to ask yourself – even if only a fraction of the Defence’s allegations were true – was the defendant given his right to due process by the ICTR. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
Indeed, Brandenburg v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 4:59 pm
AustriaDie Grünen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
There are reports, for example, of rioters perusing Pelosi’s emails—which, if true, could likely constitute a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act’s prohibition against “knowingly access[ing] a computer without authorization. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 6:45 am
In Liu v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
See Allergan Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Arizona: Ward v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
And Bey makes clear that the same is true of speech on matters of private concern. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am
Moreover, many of the factual allegations in the complaint, including those concerning the adjournment of a preliminary conference and defendants’ alleged wrongful withdrawal from representation, are flatly contradicted by documentary evidence in the record and therefore are not entitled to be considered as true (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
