Search for: "United States v. California" Results 5801 - 5820 of 13,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 11:28 am by Jay S. Becker
  Under certain circumstances and the right policy in place, the United States Supreme Court says YES. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am by Greg Mersol
  While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Gregory J. Brod
The Ellis Act is a California law that was passed in 1985 in response to the California Supreme Court case of Nash v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am by John Baker
Yet, in that same period, California is also reported to have lost about 1.2 million more people to other states than it gained from other states. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:50 am by Amy Howe
At Reason.com, Damon Root looks at the issues in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:28 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
CerulloCase number: 14-cv-02157 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: May 12, 2014Qualifying judgment/order: May 23, 2014 6/19/2014 9/17/2014 2014-64 SEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing summary judgment against his state-law claims, the Ninth Circuit rejected USA Waste’s only proffered reason for firing him—his failure to provide proof of his legal right to work in the United States—finding that the Immigration Reform and Control Act exempted him from the proof of employment eligibility the company demanded (Santillan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The struggle is real. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Of course, for federal private-prison inmates, suits against the United States directly are out. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:13 am
Unless overturned by the United States Supreme Court, these two decisions affirm substantial rights for collegiate athletes to protect the use of their likeness for commercial purposes without their consent. [read post]