Search for: "University Oral " Results 5801 - 5820 of 6,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2010, 11:25 am by Reproductive Rights
Supreme Court Oral Argument on the Roberts Court: An Empirical Examination of the Sotomayor Hypothesis on SSRN. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 4:47 am by Gritsforbreakfast
“The problem is distinguishing the alcohol,” said Michael Hlastala, a professor of physiology at the University of Washington who has testified in several court hearings against the accuracy of SCRAM. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 5:55 pm by David Oscar Markus
I don't believe that is a possibility for him.''After the hearing, Nurik said that 30 years was an exaggeration -- he said he met Rothstein when he was a student in his trial advocacy class at Nova Southeastern University law school. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 9:35 am by Duncan Hollis
by Duncan Hollis Back in 2008, I flagged the great service being done by the Squire Law Library at the University of Cambridge in compiling oral histories from some of the more eminent figures in international law. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:09 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Working on McKinney's behalf are students at Northwestern University's Medill Innocence Project. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(IP Factor) Bar Ilan University holds premature ‘After Re Bilski’ conference (IP Factor)   Latin America Madrid protocol in Latin America: a nightmare or a dream? [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 6:20 am by Teri Rodriguez
., Rice University (2003); J.D., University of Texas School of Law (2007). [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:22 am by Sean Wajert
Hoover Universal Inc., 379 S.C. 181, 666 S.E.2d 247 (S.C. 2008), the court seemed to expand the exception even farther, into commercial property. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:33 pm by Sandra C. Fava
Abbott scheduled for oral argument before the United States Supreme Court on January 12, 2010. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm by CivPro Blogger
Supreme Court Oral Argument on the Roberts Court: An Empirical Examination of the Sotomayor Hypothesis" on SSRN. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:03 pm by John Waldo
It generally takes an appellate court from six months to two years or more to announce a decision after oral argument, but sometimes -- not always, but sometimes -- the questions the judges ask at oral argument can give one an idea of what they are thinking. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
Friedman, a law professor at the University of Michigan. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:02 pm by David Kravets
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit suggested as much during oral arguments with the FCC and Comcast. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:35 pm by SOIssues
Skovran, University of Nebraska-Lincoln On Jan. 12, the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:32 am by Ed Felten
Verdict: mostly right. (8) The federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:55 am by Sam E. Antar
During the Company's two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and through March 23, 2009, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted Grant Thornton LLP regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Grant Thornton LLP… [read post]
Listen to this key exchange from the State's oral argument: The ICA concluded, "any claims that Plaintiff may have to future accretions are purely speculative, and other courts have held that a riparian owner has no vested right to future accretions. [read post]