Search for: "White v. State" Results 5801 - 5820 of 12,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2009, 7:06 pm
 The court relied upon evidence appended to the complaint which included a Life Settlement Insurance Association White Paper from 2006 which stated that a life settlement broker "has a fiduciary role to represent the seller by law . . . . [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 6:42 pm by Francis Pileggi
  The court also referred to the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 10:40 am by Steve Hall
” For Southerners, especially African-Americans, Angola is both a prison and a state of mind, a relic from before the civil rights era, when white supremacy was the custom and racial segregation was the law. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am by Lyle Denniston
The law gave the federal government control of the famous Nixon White House audiotapes and some 138 boxes of Nixon’s documents and papers. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
Thanks to Eric White for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:35 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal.4th 1094 (2007), White v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am by Richard Hunt
Judge White’s concurrence confirms what the majority opinion suggests; that is, that ADA website visitors must allege an injury beyond having encountered some accessibility problem. [read post]