Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 5821 - 5840
of 95,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 5:25 am
In a promising move for all victims of asbestos-related injuries, a Mississippi jury recently awarded a 48-year-old man the single largest plaintiff’s asbestos verdict in history. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:09 am
Who are the plaintiffs? [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 5:42 pm
All this talk about a foreclosure plaintiff needing to have proper standing, chain of title and assignment records reminds us that the same is required, but often overlooked, in credit card lawsuits. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:18 pm
For business trial lawyers and their clients, the key decisions included these -- all of which plaintiffs lost: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:25 am
In a promising move for all victims of asbestos-related injuries, a Mississippi jury recently awarded a 48-year-old man the single largest plaintiff’s asbestos verdict in history. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:19 am
Animal Feeds International Corp., a party could not be forced to arbitrate a class claim unless it had agreed to do so, and accordingly, plaintiff had to arbitrate her claims as an individual claim if at all. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:23 am
One way plaintiff can win the case is through evidence that he got pork when other inmates at the same meal got no pork at all in a supposedly meatless meal. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:08 pm
The Court sided with the Defendant that the convenience of the witnesses favored New Jersey because all the third parties citied in the complaint, which the merchant Defendant allegedly interfered with, are located in New Jersey or New York. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:45 am
Distinguishing several cases with regard to headless classes being able to go forward where a named plaintiff’s case becomes moot, Justice Thomas, writing for a 5-4 majority (a straight conservative/liberal breakout) reversed the Circuit, holding that well-settled mootness principles control and that when the named plaintiff’s suit became moot (because the ignored Rule 68 motion covered all of her interests, including attorneys’ fees), she had no personal… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 7:12 am
It only said the offer covered "all claims pending against defendants in this action. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:25 am
” Although plaintiff alleged (2)-(4), all three “presuppose the existence of some other relationship between the plaintiff and defendant in which a duty to disclose can arise. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 1:37 pm
Ultimately DOE, in response to Plaintiff additional inquiry and request for "an official appeal," sent Plaintiff two documents dated December 9, 2016 entitled "Notice of Uncompleted Requirements for Certification" explaining that Plaintiff's application had been disapproved and restated that there was "no legal means by which [DOE could] overlook" the initial missed deadline for the required payment.** Plaintiff was also advised… [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
** Plaintiff was also advised that should he wish "to further pursue the certification, he would need to reapply and meet all additional requirements. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 10:49 am
Our Suffolk Estate Litigation Attorneys at Stephen Bilkis and Associates can represent your case, and will provide you with all the legal options available in Court. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:36 am
There has been confusion in this Circuit over whether a speedy-trial dismissal constitutes a favorable termination, that is, whether it really means there was no viable criminal case at all. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 1:37 pm
Ultimately DOE, in response to Plaintiff additional inquiry and request for "an official appeal," sent Plaintiff two documents dated December 9, 2016 entitled "Notice of Uncompleted Requirements for Certification" explaining that Plaintiff's application had been disapproved and restated that there was "no legal means by which [DOE could] overlook" the initial missed deadline for the required payment.** Plaintiff was also advised… [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:06 am
The inmate does not win on all of these claims, but he prevails on some of them, and that makes this case notable. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:07 am
’” The Court considered each factor in turn, and found that all but one of them favored the plaintiffs.Having found that the plaintiffs’ trade dress has secondary meaning, the Court conducted a similar analysis to determine whether there was a likelihood of confusion between the plaintiffs’ and the defendants’ watches, using the well-known eight factor Polaroidtest. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:42 am
One plaintiff is a restaurant. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:34 am
This is all part of the totality of the circumstances test. [read post]
