Search for: "BANKS V. STATE" Results 5821 - 5840 of 15,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Arizona, 15-8366, another state capital case. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 10:11 am by Will R. Daugherty
In determining whether information should be removed, companies should consider the Guidance that states, “Information is not directly related to a cybersecurity threat if it is not necessary to assist others detect, prevent, or mitigate the cybersecurity threat. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:31 pm
The decision overturns the California Supreme Court decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:45 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
Debtors’ liabilities total approximately $7.695 billion in funded debt obligations which include: (i) $1.9 billion pursuant to a 2013 Lien Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as administrative agent; (ii) $1 billion pursuant to a 2015 Second Lien Notes with Delaware Trust Company, as successor trustee; (iii) $3.023 billion pursuant to several senior unsecured notes with Wilmington Trust Company, as indenture trustee; (iv) $899 million pursuant to a 2010 reserve-based credit… [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:20 pm by Jim Singer
 In the decision, the Federal Circuit stated: “We do not read [the Supreme Court decision in] Alice [Corporation Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
The Constitution of 1988 took the morality issue so seriously that, according to article 85(V), the president of the Republic may be criminally charged and lose his/her mandate in case of acts against administrative probity. [read post]