Search for: "C. R. C." Results 5821 - 5840 of 58,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2020, 1:22 pm by Tami Carson
They particularly encourage submissions on current cases such as: AT.40099 Google Android AT.40461 DE-DK Interconnector AT.40023 Cross-border access to pay-TV C-403/18 P Alcogroup and Alcodis v Commission C-39/18 P Commission v ICAP and Others C-617/17 Powszechny Zakład Ubezpleczeń na Źycke S.A. [read post]
22 May 2020, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
The ACLU just filed its motion for a preliminary injunction in this case, which I blogged about Wednesday. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:50 am by Greg Lambert
These three C’s will be determining factors on how well we perform both during and after the pandemic and economic troubles. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Cal. 2002) ("[c]omputer software is … speech that is protected at some level by the First Amendment"). [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:02 am
Wright and Kiel Sauerman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 Tags: Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits SeLFIES: A New Pension Bond and Currency for Retirement Posted by Robert C. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:42 pm by News Desk
The investigation was conducted at several farms identified in the outbreak traceback, as well as at other businesses and public access areas and resulted in several key findings: Each of these three outbreaks, identified in the report as Outbreaks A, B and C was caused by distinctly different strains of E. coli O157:H7 as determined by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis; Traceback investigations of multiple illness sub-clusters and supply chain information… [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:11 am by JR Chaves
En consecuencia, se trata de un supuesto de concurrencia de una cláusula de competencia material (art.10.1 h LJCA) y una cláusula de competencia formal (art.9.4 Ley 40/2015, de 1 de octubre , de Régimen Jurídico: «4. [read post]
21 May 2020, 5:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
In its decision of 26.11.2019, case 4 Ob 152/19k, the Austrian Supreme Court (“OGH”) confirmed the 2nd instance decision of the Higher Regional Court Vienna (case 133 R 20/19t of 11.07.2019), cancelling the mark, with the following – summarized – reasoning:   Firstly, the OGH recalled the criteria established by the CJEU in its Chiemsee preliminary ruling (joined cases C-108/97 and C-109/97). [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
R., Inc., 144 DPR 830 (1998), no fue incluida en el código, limitando los derechos de los consumidores. [read post]
20 May 2020, 7:08 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Section 1447(c) and emphasized that the federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.The Court noted that it had questions as to whether there was complete diversity between the parties to enable the Court to exercise subject matter jurisdiction over the case.Significantly, the Western Federal District Court also noted that, even if there was diversity, the Court would still choose to exercise its discretion under the Declaratory Judgment Act not to exercise jurisdiction over the… [read post]