Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 29,301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2014, 1:36 pm
Unlike federal law, California generally requires work-related travel time to be counted as “hours worked. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
" -- John Adams*Welcome to the Flag Day 2010 edition of Blawg Review, the weekly law blog carnival. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:37 pm
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: City and County of San Francisco, California v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:25 am
The report was left on the kitchen counter for visiting agents and potential buyers to review. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm
The article, which was based on a historical case study, appeared in Volume 119 of the Columbia Law Review. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:54 pm
Here are a couple of new questions related to California election rules: Question: If a new HOA has election rules and procedures in their By-Laws, do they need to adopt separate election rules? [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am
Starnet Insurance Company, 10 C.D.O.S. 9499, review granted 11/10/10. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
Even if it doesn’t merit federal deference, it represents a valid rule of California constitutional law, which California courts would explicitly adopt as a matter of state law if pressed. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
Rahimi; this is unsurprising, since the Court is generally inclined to review cases where a court held that a federal statute was unconstitutional, and where the federal government asks for review. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
BOEM is also seeking comments on potential sites for offshore wind turbines off the coast of California—the first such project on the West Coast. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:54 am
Most experts argue that wage-and-hour claims are really the best course of action right now because of worker-friendly laws in states such as California. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 2:35 pm
Of course, none of this is a substitute for law review, moot court, seminars, and other important writing opportunities; but I hope that it will be a helpful supplement. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:27 am
Schachter petitioned for review by the California Supreme Court, which also agreed with the lower court rulings. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:43 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, July 11, 2014:Toronto man faces charges after police say teen forced into sex tradeChallenging a Few Myths About Legal Marketing Toronto doctor cleared after politically-motivated complaint over Orthodox Jewish circumcision practiceCalifornia lawyer says someone hijacked her bar number for rogue filing in high-profile federal caseFirst person to legally purchase pot in WA fired after being seen on local news… [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 4:00 pm
In several reviews of the law on consent for brain death testing, I found overwhelming support that consent is not required. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:43 am
More recently, Chris Elmendorf and Ethan Leib have written this interesting article on the topic, which is forthcoming in the California Law Review. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:48 am
The case, City of Ontario, California, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 3:36 pm
Before joining Kirkland as an associate in 2008, Judge Bress was an associate at Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP in San Francisco from 2007 to 2008.Born in Hollister, California, Judge Bress received his J.D., Order of the Coif, in 2005 from the University of Virginia School of Law, where he was editor-in-chief of the Virginia Law Review from 2004 to 2005. [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:41 am
Supreme Court from 1991 to 1992 and was an attorney adviser in the Office of Legal Counsel at the DOJ in Washington from 1989 to 1991.Judge Collins received his J.D., with distinction and Order of the Coif, in 1988 from Stanford Law School, where he was a member and note editor of the Stanford Law Review from 1986 to 1988. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:34 pm
Even with California’s efficient proximate cause law which decidely favors policy-holders, a weather conditions exclusion in a property policy precluded coverage. [read post]
