Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 5821 - 5840 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2015, 10:15 am by Gerald J. Ferguson
Given that participation in the CISA information-sharing program is voluntary, no private company would participate in this program if merely participating subjected the company to liability. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
An early understanding of the viability of your company’s restrictive covenants and the steps your company has taken to ensure that its confidential information remains confidential will allow your company to successfully and swiftly evaluate its legal options when a crisis arises. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  Instead, as detailed in Civil Jury Instruction 1200, the plaintiff must show simply: 1) That s/he was harmed; 2) By the product; and 3) Either: a) the product was defectively designed, b) included a manufacturing defect, or c) the company did not provide appropriate warnings/instructions. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
Some individuals have stepped forward to do that with respect to the intellectual property and e-commerce chapters, such as: Nathaniel Lipkus The TPP’s IP provisions put Canada on level ground Richard C. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the definition of employer under existing law. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The plaintiff seeks to recover damages from the defendants under Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 12:04 pm
But surely the most puzzling part of the paragraph is the assertion that “[c]opyright law is a pain: companies have to go to great lengths to make sure that nobody has staked a claim to their favourite names. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:56 pm by John Jascob
A “retail buyer fund” is a qualifying private fund that is neither a venture capital company nor a qualifying private fund that qualifies for the Section 3(c)(7) exclusion from the “investment company” definition in the 1940 Act. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:21 am by Mark S. Humphreys
If no value is shown for a scheduled item then there is no coverage for that item; or c. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:58 am by Marx Sterbcow
If you have any questions about how your company’s affiliated businesses are structured please contact us to set up a consultation. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:29 am by Beth Graham
The Northern District of California judge ruled that the workers could not bring a lawsuit against their former employer due to the arbitration agreement each entered into with the company. [read post]