Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 38,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 1:31 pm
Are the lawyers bringing the suits the real deal, or are they the ERISA equivalent of patent troll lawyers, simply bringing a rash of suits and looking for a quick and inexpensive settlement? [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:32 am
Dealing with entities that are not only fictional, but that may not actually even "exist" -- e.g., unincorporated associations -- is even harder. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
When you're dealing with admittedly fictional entities like corporations and LLCs, that's maybe not so easy to tell.So that's an issue. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:17 pm
As Justice Wiley frames the issue (and its proper resolution):"Homeowners in mortgage trouble may try to negotiate a better deal. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 11:03 pm
Also, a document I discovered about a year ago explains why Ericsson prefers to sue device makers rather than do license deals with chipset makers like Qualcomm.Apple v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Section 10 deals with non-registrability of a mark for lack of distinctiveness (sub-section 2) and likelihood of confusion or deception arising from manner of use of mark (sub-section 13); s 27(1)(a) deals with registration without a genuine intention to use coupled with non-use; while s 27(1)(b) deals with non-use for five years or longer. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is New York State Thruway Authority v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
While dealing with this interesting proposition, the Hon'ble Court held as under;34. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:20 am
Hardcore students of business divorce will remember Pappas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
Written By: Justin BlaufeldIn Brulotte v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:03 pm
The US Supreme Court announced Monday it will take up the trademark case Vidal v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 1:15 pm
John Russell of the Indianapolis Star reports today on the SD Ind. decision yesterday in the case of Hoosier Energy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm
(Evans v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
It is therefore insufficient: see Novartis AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1039, [2011] ECC 10 at [77]. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
Yesterday [Aug. 2, 2023], in Gino v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
*The Court also has a section dealing with the application of the rule of investment companies, but I won't summarize that here. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm
On May 7th, the Colorado Court of Appeals issued its much anticipated ruling in Vallagio at Inverness Residential Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]
