Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5821 - 5840 of 29,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 11:30 am by Liisa Speaker
[I]f there were problems that I could not fix in the home then I’ll pull you out of the home. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 7:51 am by Philip J. Berenz
 (f) As used in this Section, "tender" means personal delivery or delivery by a means providing a return receipt. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 3:48 am
See B&B Hardware, 575 U.S. at 154 (“[F]or a great many registration decisions issue preclusion obviously will not apply because the ordinary elements will not be met. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:23 pm by Wystan Ackerman
The court noted, however, that “[a] defendant who wishes to offer complete relief need not invoke Rule 68; the defendant can simply offer complete relief, including the entry of judgment,” but the defendant did not do so in Jeffrey Stein. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:23 pm by Wystan Ackerman
The court noted, however, that “[a] defendant who wishes to offer complete relief need not invoke Rule 68; the defendant can simply offer complete relief, including the entry of judgment,” but the defendant did not do so in Jeffrey Stein. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:27 am by John Rubin
The defendant was charged with first-degree statutory sex offense, a Class B1 felony, and taking indecent liberties with a child, a Class F felony. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Meanwhile, defendant's counsel filed a written motion to dismiss pursuant to CPL § 170.30, subd. 1(f). [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
The defendant can still argue that the zone of protection for your mark depends on the establishment of secondary meaning for any goods not within the four corners of the identification of goods or services. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 1:15 pm
Nunley, 873 F.2d 182, 184-85 (8th Cir. 1989) (holding that consensual encounter became seizure which invalidated subsequent consent to search where police officers' statements to the defendant that they were attempting to stop the flow of drugs indicated that the defendant was the "particular focus of a narcotics investigation"); State v. [read post]