Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 10:04 am
However, that interpretation of the decision is likely unduly expansive – especially since a patentee can collect back-damages for pre-issuance infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:15 am
Does it strike you as odd that the government would indict someone for crimes that would carry penalties of up to 35 years in prison and $1 million fines, and then offer them a three month prison sentence?" [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
” Complaint, Pg. 19, Para. 35. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:01 pm
Here are the earlier entries: 1. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
The copper parts are plated in the bath for 6 minutes at 35°C (see D2, page 1, point 3A). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 10:45 am
Co. of Newark, N.J., 35 N.J. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
So what does this have to do with voting? [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
Points of real divergence 1. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
Instead, as noted by the opponent […] and undisputed by the proprietor, granted claim 1 does not limit in any way the amount of olefins possibly present in the L-fraction. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
Lexis 449, at *35. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
Here are the earlier entries: 1. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
Option No. 1: The Constitution permits states to limit marriage only to opposite-sex couples. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:06 am
I would accept that principle as applying to a criminal prosecution, in order to protect the absolute right to a fair trial.35. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:06 pm
It reinforces and expands rule No. 35, which prohibits the exclusion of cardinal electors in cases when they express their voice during balloting that does not result in an election of a pontiff. 2. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
In writing my testimony for today’s House Judiciary Committee hearing on drones and targeted killing of U.S. citizens overseas, I found myself writing a more complete explication of the essential legal rationale underlying the administration’s position on the subject than I have, to date, set down in one place. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:26 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the Federal Circuit found in favor of Classen, holding that 271(e)(1) "does not apply to information that may be routinely reported to the FDA, long after marketing approval has been obtained." [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
Constitution, which appeared in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 35 (2012). [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Do you want to know how to beat an Examiner's 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2013] CSOH 28 P47/12 OPINION OF LORD DRUMMOND YOUNG in the Petition of Mr William MacReath Petitioner; for Judicial Review of a decision of the Law Society of Scotland Act: Ferguson QC, Watts; Simpson & Marwick, Alt: Lindsay QC; Anderson Strathern LLP (Law Society of Scotland) Alt: Miss C, personally (Interested Party) 20 February 2013 [1] The petitioner seeks judicial review of a decision of the Law Society of Scotland dated 10 January 2012. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
Does anyone know? [read post]
