Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 30,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 6:24 pm
In State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:28 pm
Eric VanDussen asked the Court of Appeals to permit him to videotape oral argument in People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 8:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
This was the holding in Kelly v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
Carl V. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:41 am
“Commerce among nations should be fair and equitable. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Restricts Classification of Employees as Exempt "Learned Professionals" Under the FLSA
13 Sep 2011, 3:13 pm
In a recent Ninth Circuit decision, Solis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:00 pm
In Guaranty Trust Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:32 am
Schwab of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued a post-Koken decision in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:46 am
However, a recent Second Circuit decision - Schwartz v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:42 am
Doeff v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:30 am
Amirsaleh v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:12 am
Verrett v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
DOJ Antitrust Division Head Christine Varney Offers Guidance on Leegin and Proposes "Structured Rule of Reason Test" For Evaluating RPM Under State Laws When the Supreme Court modified the prohibition against resale price maintenance agreements ("RPM") more than two years ago in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 8:09 am
This week we highlight petitions pending before the Supreme Court that address, among other things, the ability of a court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant when the defendant knew its conduct would have in-state effects but the conduct occurred outside the state, the possibility of the Federal Aviation Act’s pre-empting state-law design-defect claims, and whether the Portal-to-Portal Act modified the definition of “work” in the… [read post]
