Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 5821 - 5840 of 16,012
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2017, 3:55 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Una de las  enmiendas autoriza al Superintendente de la Policía o cualquier persona autorizada por ley para tomar huellas digitales o fotografías a los fines de atemperarla a las enmiendas propuestas a las Reglas de Procedimiento Criminal. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/fKlPmmLVcS -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-03-28 https://t.co/7pKjW7yXt2 -> Major breach of confidence case Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/9Ju5PFkZfb -> Health Record Snooping Nets Hefty Fine https://t.co/VuJmmWHndI -> [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It appeared as though their political involvement since the entry of Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority in 1979 had led to one spectacular defeat after another—Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It appeared as though their political involvement since the entry of Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority in 1979 had led to one spectacular defeat after another—Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am by Erik Slobe
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by Nelson Tebbe
On Monday, a Fifth Circuitpanel will hear Barber v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Clearly, you liked the nation’s capital just fine: you chose to stay on for college at American University and only left the city for the wild and distant climes of Montgomery County, Maryland in ’66, once you had your Ph.D in business. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
” The administration appears to be slicing words very finely here, arguing that the White House did not “block” Yates’s testimony because it did not respond to Yates’s lawyer’s letter to McGahn, which asserted that the lawyer would conclude that the White House did not intend to assert executive privilege if he did not receive a response by Monday March 27th. [read post]