Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 61,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2017, 8:03 pm
Beekman Delamater Properties, LLC v Village of Rhinebeck Zoning Board of Appeals, 2017 WL 2260271 (NYAD 2 Dept. 5/24/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Site Plan Review, Special Use/Exception, Uncategorized [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 2:33 pm
New Grants City of Desoto v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:47 pm
In JG v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Steen, 10-671 (which had been relisted twice), and granted in Golan v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:02 am
The Plaintiff Suffers Worsening Symptoms After Having a Surgery Performed by the Defendant The plaintiff in the case of Borrayo v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:00 am
Aryeh v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:03 am
The district court granted the motion, despite the lack of a leakproof contract formation mechanism. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
Although Tarble’s Case has long been read as imposing constitutional limits on state courts’ authority to grant habeas relief, Vázquez and Vladeck think it is better understood as a statutory restriction on state courts. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:51 am
(citing Koester v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:48 am
Heitmann v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
The problem is that in many states, no prompt payment statutes exist, and no awards of attorneys fees are granted. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Nwachan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 11:00 pm
In the case of Miller v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
On Monday, SCOTUSblog will kick off an online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:28 am
Aug. 1, 2011), a decision in which a federal court judge decided to grant a motion to stay the federal proceedings in favor of another lawsuit in a Louisiana state court. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Canton v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:04 am
Title: Maples v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:49 pm
Audio of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]