Search for: "House v. State"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 25,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2014, 7:46 pm
The Hales were owners of a house on agricultural land about one mile southeast of a shooting range in Ward County, used to train local, state, and federal law enforcement officers. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm
Jarkesy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:11 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:51 pm
In Feldman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:51 pm
In Feldman v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:39 am
Undermining people’s ability to take care of themselves and their families undermines the ways communities work, and we all pay the cost. [1] Chris Arnold, A New Trump Rule Could Weaken A Civil Rights Era Housing Discrimination Law, All Things Considered, July 31, 2019, 5:20 PM, available at https://www.npr.org/2019/07/31/747006108/a-new-trump-rule-could-weaken-a-civil-rights-era-housing-discrimination-law. [2] Washington v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
It will come into force on “such day as the Secretary of State may appoint”. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:02 pm
House of Representatives in oppositionReply of petitioner Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:22 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
The styled of the opinion is Benham Bagheri v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Rogers case (DUVAL MOTORS CO. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
· This decision, Baldwin v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
The most notable contemporaneous example was Chancellor McCormick’s post-trial opinion in Tornetta v. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 3:56 am
In the recent case of Arellano v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:24 am
He also doubted the reasoning of the trial judge regarding negative declaratory relief being an appropriate remedy, stating that it is “at best, an ungainly remedy”. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 5:05 pm
By Eric Goldman Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:22 pm
In general, local authorities have followed R v LB Ealing Ex p Sidhu (1982) 2 HLR 48 (Sidhu), in which the High Court found that a refuge could not be considered as accommodation for the purposes of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977, then in force. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:06 am
’ United States v. [read post]
