Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 40,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 1:52 am
Perhaps surprisingly, LBIE has a large surplus following payment of or provision for unsubordinated proved debts in full. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm
Judge Stucky, writing for a unanimous court in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:12 am
” The Court’s recent decision on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act individual health insurance mandate in NFIB v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm
This editorial appears in today's New York Times: Gutting Class Action The Supreme Court’s 5-to-4 vote in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:21 pm
Kuciemba v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:40 am
Helden v Strathmore [2011] EWCA Civ 542 contains lots of useful footnotes and pointers on different issues, so it’s worth a read. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:40 am
Helden v Strathmore [2011] EWCA Civ 542 contains lots of useful footnotes and pointers on different issues, so it’s worth a read. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
Synthes, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Ritz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:08 am
Luzerne County Court of Common PleasWilkes-Barre, PAIn the case of Hartford Fire Insurance Co v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
In Cooper v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:09 am
Australia; andalthough the Royal Mint has sold a large volume of coins over a long period of time and had a very significant share of the gold coins market in the UK, it had not established that consumers perceived gold coins as originating from a particular undertaking based on the word "sovereign" alone.This decision was made after hearing evidence from two experts in coinage - from the British Museum and Royal Mint Museum. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:19 am
Ronald V. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
I know of only one case where the government dismissed a claim under 3730(c)(2)(a): US ex rel Roach v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
I know of only one case where the government dismissed a claim under 3730(c)(2)(a): US ex rel Roach v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:27 am
Since the Supreme Court’s opinion last May in AT&T v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 3:56 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
