Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 29,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 8:19 am
The case principally concerned the first element of the test for vicarious liability recently set out in Various claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] UKSC 56: whether the relationship between the tortfeasor and defendant was such that the defendant could be made vicariously liable for the tortfeasor’s actions. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
The level of protection conferred on the three-dimensional helmet depends on whether or not it is a “sculpture” for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 4. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Chavez v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
Pandian v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:47 am
See Caetano v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
Bailey Lumber & Supply Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 4:09 pm
On 4 February 2021, the Constitutional Court handed down its decision in the case of AmaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2021] ZACC 3. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:20 pm
Qualcomm (San Jose, January 2019) and Apple v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:31 am
Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
In Collings v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 6:24 am
On March 18, 2020, the Delaware Supreme court ruled in Salzberg v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 7:32 am
In 1997’s Metro-North v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:54 am
“We were interested to see if in-house counsel would continue to experiment with — or continue to deploy — new fee structures once the markets began to rebound and budgets were not under the same level of stress in 2010. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
