Search for: "Lovings v. State" Results 5821 - 5840 of 8,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v Theatre Mayo Clinic Company (Afro-IP)   Thailand Thailand to join PCT Treaty (The IP Factor)   United Kingdom UK IP minister hopeful of ‘significant progress’ on Community patent and court (IAM) EWHC: Woolworths woolly IP agreements don’t hold value: Butters & Ors v BBC Worldwide & Ors (IP finance) If you liked the Rule, you’ll love the Practice… [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
 Despite the uncertainty around the long-term success of NFTs, we have certainly seen a “land grab” from brands filing trade marks, including ITV (for LOVE ISLAND), Heineken and even The Empire State Building [Katpost with details from Becky Knott here]. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Cari Rincker
The first private pension plan in the United States was established in the late 1800s. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 9:01 am by Steve McConnell
We don't know why and would love to hear anyone's speculation. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Relies on member states; referrals go through national authorities. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Steve Hall
“The little parts that he loved so much. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am by Andres
The Hat represents that love, only a person who has nothing to lose would wear that monstrosity of yarn on their head. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Whether it falls under that line of cases will depend on some further facts, as State of Oregon v Rajneeshpuram shows. [read post]
ROBERT SCOTT, HONORABLECOMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, THORNTON KEEL, DONNA KEEL, MICHAEL HELLRUNG, DONNA HELLRUNG, WILLIAM PASCHALL, DAVID WOMACK, NATALIE KLOSS, DARRYL HUBBELL AND AMY HUBBELL; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00576-CV, 275 SW3d 558, 11-14-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009)09-0138CITY OF AUSTIN, ET AL. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:53 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Thus, the court says that it’s possible plaintiffs state a VPPA claim based on the disclosures to Facebook. [read post]