Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 5821 - 5840 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 10:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
” However, the Court of Appeal found that CSTI improperly focused on the EIR’s designation rather than its substance “[T]he ‘fact that this EIR is labeled a “project” rather than a “program” EIR matters little…. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
Merely asking for an investigation, in the Journal’s view, isn’t enough. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 1:08 am
As a matter of language it is a bit like saying light is transparent to glass but those skilled in the art know what is meant. * “protocol transparency”. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:31 pm by Ron Coleman
And with that in mind, and having learned, or, for you, perhaps, reviewed all that, it’s hard not to think this:  After the recent decision in B&B Hardware — which clearly, as the court implicitly acknowledged and the consensus of commentators do-it-yourself trademark registration for anything that matters, or could matter; that registering trademarks is something to be farmed out to self-described… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  Nationwide responded by filing the F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:51 am by Arielle E. Katz
HomeAdvisor asserted that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to the arbitration clause in its terms and conditions. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:51 am by Arielle E. Katz
HomeAdvisor asserted that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to the arbitration clause in its terms and conditions. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:51 am by Arielle E. Katz
HomeAdvisor asserted that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to the arbitration clause in its terms and conditions. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 3:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
Wrong venue Addressing defendants’ motion to dismiss under both Chancery Rule 12(b)(3) for improper venue and Chancery Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state viable claims , Vice Chancellor Slights first denied Sylebra’s belated motion to amend the claims, finding that plaintiff in effect, put the cart before the horse by concentrating on opposing dismissal under 12(b)(6) before seeking leave to amend. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
Option 3 is the traditional sentence, which in this matter would be the high term of nine years, plus 10 years for the firearm, plus 10 years for the two prior convictions, and three years for the priors under P.C. 667.5, subsection (b). [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 7:58 am
Roosevelt didn't want to be associated with Hoover and Hoover's policies, especially if the bank holiday failed. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm by familoo
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 4:38 am
By the way, don't guess on Contracting States, or signers, either. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:44 am by Chris Seaton
“Deputy Miranda, this is an all hands matter. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 2:55 pm by Mike
 Culture is destiny, and dating reveals what truly matters in culture. [read post]