Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 5821 - 5840 of 13,720
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
Hopefully this matter will be resolved for the next edition in six months time. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Brown, 740 F.3d 1208, 1225–29 (9th Cir. 2013) (as amended on rehearing). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words… [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
” … [They] are “those personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:38 am by Camilla Hrdy
Wabtec Corp, 559 F.3d 110, 118-119 (2d Cir. 2009) that"A rebuttable presumption of irreparable harm might be warranted in cases where there is a danger that, unless enjoined, a misappropriator of trade secrets will disseminate those secrets to a wider audience or otherwise irreparably impair the value of those secrets. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
  Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695, 710-11 (D.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by 1 Crown Office Row
 It is reported that NM was invited to prisoner F’s room: During this association period NM invited F into his cell where they drank coffee and smoked. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:27 am by Joshua Lloyd
There is a ready solution for jails that don’t have the room for a library or the funding for full-time legal services staff. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:51 am
., 532 F. 3d 1318. which drew a contrast between defendants who "masterminded" an infringement carried out between different entities and those whose involvement was of the "arm's-length" variety.The District Court held that Limelight didn't directly infringe the patent because the "tagging" could not be attributed to it. [read post]