Search for: "Mark"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 151,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 3:13 am
On appeal, applicant argued that it was not seeking to register its mark for plush or stuffed animals, that registrant's customers are shopping for baby board books that are accompanied by stuffed toys, and that the marks are different because applicant's mark is "ironic" while the cited mark is literal. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:41 am
Dana Leigh Marks, Mar. 12, 2024 How Low Will They Go? [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
As such the Redskins could easily prevent the use of its mark even if their marks are cancelled. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:23 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark PhotoGro for "fertilizers for agricultural use," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark PHOTO MAX for "fertilizers; plant nutrition preparations" [PHOTO disclaimed]. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:16 am
The Board, however, observed that the prior registered marks were not the same as the proposed mark; in fact, the proposed mark is closer to the cited mark than the prior marks. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:45 am
"For them, the marks may have no meaning and the visual and phonetic aspects of the marks, as well as the overall commercial impression created by the marks, will be the critical elements in forming their impressions of the marks. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:10 am
"The Marks: The Board found the marks to be similar in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:38 am
Respondent's mark, taken in its entirety, "creates a wholly different commercial impression from Petitioner's marks. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
Any intention to use the mark may go to promotional services for dealerships, but not to "vehicles for transportation. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:18 am
A little case about construction stilts could mean big fines for companies found liable under the false patent marking statute. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
As long as you are the first to use the mark in connection with your products, and no other person has filed an application to register the same or similar mark, you are generally entitled to exclusive use of that mark in the geographic area in which the mark has been used.Nonetheless, registering the mark at the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:17 am
Stepping back from what is colloquially referred to as the Firm (though IIRC it was Her Majesty herself who first used the expression) evidently involves turning to trade mark law for protection. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:03 am
" The Examining Attorney had found the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark BREEZE ACCESS for equipment and accessories for broadband wireless access. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:51 am
Mark III Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
What happens when a user of a mark for one category of goods begins to use that mark in another category of goods – in which a second party has a registered mark. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 12:39 pm
After investigation, FSIS determined that the product was ineligible and misbranded with a false USDA mark of inspection. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
The move was welcomed by banking interests that have also pushed for a loosening of mark-to-market accounting rules in the bailout legislation. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:23 pm
The competing trade marks can be viewed here. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:58 am
"Considering the marks in their entireties, we find the marks are very similar in sight, sound, connotation, and overall commercial impression." [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
Don Calder applied to register the mark CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC for various clothing items, but the USPTO refused registration on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark shown below, for overlapping clothing items [CALIFORNIA disclaimed in both marks]. [read post]
