Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 14,919
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 9:59 am
Supreme Court last year, Elonis cited his inclusion of the emoticon “:-P” several times as part of his arguments that: (1) he lacked the intent required for conviction and (2) his posts were easily misunderstood and communications that are subject to misunderstandings shouldn’t be criminalized. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
Olsson, supra; Section 30–6A–2(B). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
" (6 Wigmore, § 1873, p 672 [emphasis in original].) [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
" (6 Wigmore, § 1873, p 672.)People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:31 pm
Int J Food Microbiol. 126(1-2):30-35. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
Seeking to ground DAPA’s sweeping relief in accepted practice, Justice Sotomayor observed (Tr. 90) that, “[p]eople who have asylum don’t have a pathway to citizenship,” but are still eligible for work permits. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:18 pm
(P. 91) Accordingly, they were not dangerous enough to justify the risks that a monitoring requirement would pose for free expression. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:24 am
(2) The Doherty case was about a particular trust, and did not change Massachusetts Medicaid trust law. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:24 am
(2) The Doherty case was about a particular trust, and did not change Massachusetts Medicaid trust law. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
§ 282(b)(2). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
Concluding Observations I wouldn’t be surprised if this case ends up back in the Supreme Court of Ohio. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 6:47 am
By Joy P. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
(See People's Memorandum of Law at p. 5.) [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:31 am
Esto levanta preocupaciones sobre los casos más importantes del presente término de la corte, que usualmente son decididos en votaciones divididas en 5-4 durante los últimos días del mes de junio. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
I don’t recall discussing the Blake case with him at the time or afterward. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
I don’t recall discussing the Blake case with him at the time or afterward. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
(véase aquí 1 y aquí 2). [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
§ 147.131(c)(2)(i). [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
John Reed Stark There have been several very high profile news reports of significant law firm data breaches. [read post]
