Search for: "People v Favors" Results 5821 - 5840 of 11,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2010, 11:30 am by Andrew Coan
This means that, other things being equal, we should favor the judicial approach most likely to render amendment unnecessary. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 10:39 am by mdkeenan
In People v Flores, an officer stopped a defendant because he believed the defendant’s license plate frame was illegal. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:09 am by Carolina Guiral
Provide examples of factors that weigh in favor of approval when USCIS officers perform the two-part “final merits” analysis under Kazarian v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 5:52 pm by kaplan4law
As the Supreme Court recognized in a landmark 2004 case, Crawford v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:48 am by John Elwood
" As Jonathan Adler notes below, Michael Dorf comments favorably on the evenhandedness of Justice Thomas's description in his dissent from denial of cert. of the arguments made by Manuel Noriega, even though Prof. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Viewed in that context, any thought a consumer might have that the words “Havana Club” indicate the geographic origin of the rum must certainly be dispelled by the plain and explicit statements of geographic origin on the label, according to the court.Survey EvidenceThe trial court properly disregarded the survey evidence as immaterial, because the Lanham Act does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading, the court… [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:42 pm by mdkeenan
In People v Viverette, the defendant argued that his license could not be revoked for leaving the scene of an accident because it had already been revoked for an earlier offense. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:27 am by Alan Ackerman
Any constitutional change, especially one so dear to the hearts of so many people as eminent domain, will present frustration, anger and confusion. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:47 pm
The Louisiana Supreme Court subsequently upheld the statute despite the United States Supreme Court holding in Coker v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:09 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Whitbeck's 35-page dissent in favor of dumping the case at the summary disposition level.What changed? [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 12:29 pm by Kenneth B. Weckstein
Also, ironically, one of the studies that OFCCP cites in the proposed rules found that “surveys asking how people feel about pay secrecy indicate that the majority of U.S. workers are in favor of it. [read post]