Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 5821 - 5840 of 55,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2008, 11:56 pm
Back in April, when the Supreme Court denied certiorari for Murphy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm by Nerds in Court
In case you are not one of the over 10 million people who have purchased Elder Scroll V: Skyrim since its critically acclaimed release in November, “Fus Ro Dah” is magical shout. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:12 am by Simon Fodden
Anthony & Cleopatra, Act 1, Scene V. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Related, CPSC finally holds public hearing on magnet sets standard [WLF Legal Pulse] SCOTUS sleeper Bond v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
Tony Mauro has this post at BLT on a "dust up" over whether whether the Harvard Law prof's name can appear on an amicus brief in a global warming climate change case now before the US Supreme Court, American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:18 am
Appellate Courts Begin to Consider How Bristol-Myers Applies to Class Actions This quarter, appellate courts wrestled for the first time with the application of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:57 am
Here is the abstract: What we call "judicial review" was not established in Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:24 am by James M. Beard
A Seattle jury awarded 1.35 Million dollars in damages to an Alaska Crab Fisherman, David Zielinski, who suffered a severe hand aboard the F/V TIME BANDIT in January of 2013. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
The lead case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:16 am
In Ms Jacqueline Power v (1) The Trustees of the Open Text (UK) Limited Group Life Assurance Scheme (2) Open Text (UK) Limited [2009] EWHC 3064 (Ch), the High Court considered whether either the trustee of an employee life assurance scheme or the employer that issued the scheme was under a duty to consider the level of cover provided under the scheme and whether the trustee was under a duty to consider whether the cover was appropriate.The claimant, a widow, had brought proceedings… [read post]