Search for: "R G v. G S" Results 5821 - 5840 of 6,912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
"Se os usuários ficarem livres para escolher, fraquezas vão surgir", diz Shulman. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:49 am
Les banques et les cabinets d'avocats doivent être en mesure de pouvoir identifier et vérifier l'identité de leurs clients. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:11 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Lewis and Clark Tomás Gómez-Arostegui (Lewis & Clark), Lessons from Tonson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Burrows v Smith (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) UK MP’s frozen out of ACTA (Michael Geist) (IPKat) HMRC on the attack on image rights? [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
It's not clear from the tangle and the masks who is in control, but it's clear it is not G-rated. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Rosalind English
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:45 am
Processing of an administrative appeal does not toll the running of a statute of limitationsMatter of Yolanda Strong v New York City Dept. of Educ., 62 AD3d 592State Supreme Court, New York County, Leland G. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:33 am
Increasing the compensation of the State’s judiciaryLarabee v Governor of the State of New York, 65 AD3d 74Two Family Court Judges, a Civil Court Judge and a Criminal Court Judge, whose salaries are specified in Judiciary Law § 221-e and § 221-g, initiated litigation naming the Governor, the New York State Senate, the State Assembly, and the State of New York as defendants.The judges seek redress [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am by sally
R (G) v Governors of X School (Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1; [2010] WLR (D) 4 “Where an individual was subject to two or more sets of proceedings, or phases of a single proceeding, and a civil right or obligation enjoyed or owed by him would be determined in one of them, he could (but not necessarily would), by force of art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, enjoy… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bhamra v Dubb (t/a Lucky Caterers) [2010] EWCA Civ 13 (20 January 2010) G, R (on the application of) v X School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1 (20 January 2010) Supershield Ltd v Siemens Building Technologies FE Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 7 (20 January 2010) In the Pink Ltd v Leeds Magistrates Court & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 8 (20 January 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) B2net Ltd v HM… [read post]