Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 5821 - 5840 of 30,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2020, 12:57 pm by Leonard L. Gordon and Katelyn J. Patton
United States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987), in which the United States Supreme Court interpreted the jury trial provision of the Seventh Amendment to the federal Constitution and held that where the government seeks both injunctive relief and civil penalties, the defendant is entitled to a jury trial on the question of liability. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Amendment reads in full: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:22 am by Robert T. Quackenboss
Many legal commentators suspect that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately have to resolve the matter. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Jessica Gutierrez Alm
” The Girl Scouts of the United States of America (GSUSA) has been openly and decisively against the Boy Scouts’ policy change. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:08 pm by Josh Blackman
Baca, however, yielded a one sentence per curiam order: The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:17 pm
One would think that, given the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court and the Supremacy Clause, unreliable identification is inadmissible in New York courts. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994); Carson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
Writing a brief for the United States before the Supreme Court is a very different enterprise than writing a brief for a private party. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]