Search for: "S. et al" Results 5821 - 5840 of 29,083
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 7:45 am by Unknown
Publications:Between Closed Borders: Joint Agency Paper on Refugees and Migrants in Serbia 2018 (UNHCR et al., July 2019) [text]Border Procedures: Not a Panacea - ECRE's Assessment of Proposals for Increasing or Mandatory Use of Border Procedures (ECRE, July 2019) [text]"A European Field of Public Administration? [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:55 am by Daily Record Staff
Alves, presiding, that affirmed a decision of the County Council of Prince George’s County, sitting as the District Council. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:34 am by B. Michael Clark, Jr.
Construction Enterprises Inc. et al., Royal Palms appealed the nonfinal order entered in favor of Construction Enterprises Inc. staying the developer’s lawsuit pending mediation and arbitration based on its assertion that the trial court erred in finding a valid arbitration agreement existed and its claim was subject to arbitration. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:53 am by Dan Ernst
Woodward, with contributions by Naomi Lamoreau, Evelyn Atkinson, et al. is ongoing. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:45 am by Unknown
"Disability among Palestinian Elderly in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (oPt): Prevalence and Associated Factors," BMC Public Health, 19:432 (April 2019) [open access]Disability and Armed Conflict, Academy Briefing, no. 14 (Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, April 2019) [text via ReliefWeb]"Fleeing my whole life": Older People’s Experience of Conflict and Displacement in Myanmar (Amnesty International, June 2019) [text]Forgotten… [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held in the case of Idaho Conservation League et al., v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:52 pm by Vishnu Kannan
William Barr et al., a case challenging the Trump administration’s rule denying asylum for any migrants who attempt to enter the United States along the southern border without first applying for asylum in a third country through which they travelled. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:00 am by Unknown
This is What They Told Me (The Conversation, July 2019) [text]"No Mother Wants Her Child to Migrate": Vulnerability of Children on the Move in the Horn of Africa (Unicef, June 2019) [text]Protecting and Supporting Internally Displaced Children in Urban Settings (Unicef & IDMC, July 2019) [text]Sport for Protection Toolkit: Programming with Young People in Forced Displacement Settings (UNHCR et al., July 2019) [text via ReliefWeb]Unprotected: Crisis in Humanitarian… [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:06 am by Kevin Kaufman
If a state must offer a “holiday” from its tax system, it is an implicit recognition that the state’s tax system is uncompetitive. [read post]
’”6 The court then asserted “the balance of the Court’s reasoning in [Upland] applies equally here, and supports the same conclusion. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Among its products so far: an overview paper by Anastasia Boden et al.; a paper on how the thicket operates in one urban jurisdiction, the District of Columbia [Yesim Sayin Taylor]; a video on how it affects an Oregon couple’s home-based telecommunications services firm; and a teleforum with Brooks Rainwater and Luke Wake. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:39 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Lyon (University of Southern California, City University of New York - John Jay College of Criminal Justice and University of Southern California Gould School of Law) have posted Children's Concealment of a Minor... [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Kamp, Right Rights, (January 29, 2019).Erik Baldwin, et. al., The Burqa Ban: Legal Precursors for Denmark, American Experiences and Experiments, and Philosophical and Critical Examinations,(International Studies Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, Summer 2018).Laura T. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm by Stuart Kaplow
WellgreensCA, Inc., et al, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, case no. 19 CR 2439WQH, is significant beyond being a criminal prosecution of a RCRA violation because it may be the first public application of the current Trump Administration policy on Federal cannabis prosecution in states with legal cannabis. [read post]