Search for: "Session v. State"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
Now drinkers can enjoy the IPKat's football prowess via Greek decoders Breathlessly back on the blog after this morning's envigorating copyright and trade mark law training session with a bright and bushy-tailed batch of trainees, this Kat now turns to the main news of the moment, today's momentous ruling of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Putting aside rights that arise from contractual or other state-law guarantees of academic freedom, if a public employee is speaking (even on matters of public concern) while on the job, qua employee, then under the 2006 Supreme Court Garcetti v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:31 pm
Join the third session on Hate Speech. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:08 am
For all the attention given the PHH v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:06 pm
For example, in a 2015 case, Rowe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:08 am
For all the attention given the PHH v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:05 am
Federal and state judiciaries, led by the U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:26 pm
Read the opinion here: Atwater v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:17 am
Phillips, Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; Jill E. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
If the EP decides to vote against the JURI mandate, every MEP will be able to file an amendment to the JURI report in the next plenary session in September. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
In National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:30 am
Public Citizen helped pass 14 energy efficiency and renewable energy bills in the Texas legislative session. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am
If the EP decides to vote against the JURI mandate, every MEP will be able to file an amendment to the JURI report in the next plenary session in September. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
Consider one recent example: by a vote of eight to zero, the Justices reversed the Ninth Circuit decision in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:26 am
This leads to a rare potential victory for someone who illegally came to the U.S. from Indonesia, and who is seeking to reopen his asylum case.From Sihotang v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
ITEX Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
This was, of course, the Act at issue in Monsanto v. [read post]
