Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 5821 - 5840 of 8,568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 5:22 am by Robert A. Epstein
  With that, it was almost coincidental that the Appellate Division just released a new unreported (not precedential) decision in Lowy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by CJLF Staff
In the ruling, the state Supreme Court upheld the death penalty for Abraham Sanchez Jr., who had challenged the timing and use of the jury in adjudicating his claim of death penalty ineligibility under Atkins v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:58 am by admin
On December 8, 2011, the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Whistleblower v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:16 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
If our tech cooperates, on Wednesday, January 4, 2012, starting at 9:00 a.m., we'll be live blogging the Hawaii Supreme Court oral arguments in the Big Island reapportionment cases, Solomon v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
’  Even as it revitalized judicial enforcement of the Tenth Amendment in cases such as New York and Printz, the Court treated spending as an exception by stating that the federal government could basically buy state cooperation without running afoul of the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:31 am by Joe Palazzolo
Courts: Newt Gingrich stepped up his criticism of the Third Branch on Sunday, saying that Cooper v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 12 December 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Cooper v Turrell [2011] EWHC 3269 (QB), an assessment of damages in a libel, breach of confidence and misuse of private information case. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
EU law – Strasbourg law There is nothing flimsy or wishy-washy about states’ obligations under EU law, whatever economic or political crises may be assailing Europe in general: the obligation arising from any EU directive is to achieve the result envisaged by that directive, and therefore each state has a duty to take all appropriate measures to ensure the fulfilment of that obligation in accordance with the principle of “sincere cooperation” in the… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:26 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The latest opinion from the state Superior Court in the context of UIM bad-faith litigation is the case of Rhodes v. [read post]