Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 5821 - 5840
of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
”* The “rare exception” referred to by the Justice Gammerman is probably the one leading to the decision in Roulett v Town of Hempstead Civil Service Commission, 40 AD2d 611. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
Both the order granting formal probation and the judgment state defendant is to `[r]egister per . . . [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:22 am
By Nicole Greenstein C’14Four distinguished panelists gathered in Penn Law’s Levy Conference Room on September 22 to discuss and answer questions about the previous and upcoming Supreme Court terms. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
Horan issued a November 5, 2009 Opinion and Order in the post-Koken case of Baptiste v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am
Related PostsDecember 15, 2010 -- In advance of A, B & C v Ireland: A Primer on the ECtHR (0)October 28, 2010 -- Preventive detention, risk and the ECHR (1) [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
R. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
The recitals to the ECD give more detail as to the scope of services protected by Article 14 and there is a certain amount of case law on this point, notably Google Adwords (Case C-236/08) and the Grand Chamber decision in L’Oreal v. eBay (Case C-324/09). [read post]
8 May 2015, 10:41 am
The Court pointed out that it had long ago rejected the proposition that there was an unstated police power exception to the Pension Clause in Felt v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm
Western States Petroleum Association v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 3:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:47 am
Using the agency's equipment for non-official purposesEkpecham v Ross, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education No. 14,651 Priscilla A. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
., Bliss v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:02 pm
Moore v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:40 pm
From today's Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:11 am
C'mon! [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Xavier R. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
This latter rule, by incorporation of R 41(2)(c), defines the standard formal administrative items of information required to fill out the notice of appeal, which will permit the identification of the appellant. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:51 pm
However, it is submitted that when the dicta cited by the Court referr to classification, they refer to the Legislature being given “a free hand to devise classes – whom to tax or not to tax, whom to exempt and whom not to exempt” (State of U.P. v. [read post]
