Search for: "State v. Self" Results 5821 - 5840 of 15,622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
Renting a room in a private Cuban residence (casa particular), eating at privately owned Cuban restaurants (paladares), and shopping at privately owned stores run by self- employed Cubans (cuentapropistas) are examples of authorized activities; however, in order to meet the requirement of a full-time schedule, a traveler must engage in additional authorized Support for the Cuban People activities. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by Bernie Burk
  The contract by which the Boies Firm engaged Black Cube for Weinstein’s benefit earlier this year (available on The New Yorker website here) specifically states that it supersedes a 2014 written agreement between Black Cube and the Boies Firm, “acting on behalf of the [same] Client,” so it appears that the Boies Firm has engaged Black Cube for Weinstein’s benefit before. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
Dismissing as entirely unhelpful the wealth of Western engagements with Chinese Marxist Leninist constitutionalism—precisely because eat their base this literature starts from the presumption of illegitimacy and the premise that constitutionalism and Marxism Leninism is an oxymoron (and thus tell us more about the state of Western self-conceptions than of the object studied)—most commentators on the rich and quite dynamic evolution of constitutionalism in China break… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  The compromisers hoped that this would enable federal courts to correct clearly wrong state court decisions while not committing gross errors of their own or imposing their own precedents (rather than the Supreme Court's) on the state courts.The problem is that it takes considerable self-restraint and humility to say "I would not have decided the case that way, but it is within the limits in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Div. 1959) (slip and fall in self-service market on wet floor near vegetable bin). [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Bruno agreed that the constructive trust claim failed to state a valid cause of action, for two reasons. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
  Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]