Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 5821 - 5840 of 7,102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2010, 7:33 am by Darren O'Donovan
Events in France and the United Kingdom illustrate the common grammar of Traveller/Roma exclusion within Ireland and other European states. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am by Matthew Scarola
United States, which threw] into doubt his 2006 conviction for fraud and conspiracy. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Jurisdiction also is available where conduct occurred outside the United States but which had a foreseeable substantial effect within the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:53 am by Erin Miller
        At a speech at Montana State University yesterday, Justice Scalia said that judges are not qualified to decide “the leading moral questions of the day” and that the big dividing line in the United States is between “those who believe [the Constitution] does not change and those who think it evolves. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:10 am by David Doniger
  The report, Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States Using Existing Federal Authorities and State Action, examines the major sectors and activities that contribute most to our country’s carbon pollution inventory. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:16 pm by Gideon
Just the say-so of a 44 year old woman, almost an entire lifetime after it allegedly occurred.1 Imagine, as Justice Douglas did, dissenting in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by Jason Rantanen
  Although as a practical matter this distinction may be of little value, as pharmaceutical companies often have production facilities located outside the United States, it is something to consider when seeking or opposing litigation under § 156. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am by Colin Murray
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:27 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Perhaps no decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on “unreasonable search and seizure” has come in for more criticism than Terry v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
On first reading, it might appear that, a few minor differences aside, this provision simply represents a codification of the common law privilege first articulated in Reynolds and later developed by the House of Lords in Jameel . [read post]