Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 60,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 3:09 am
The IPKat's informant fills the gap as follows:"In its judgment of 28 January 2010, the Brussels court of appeal has referred questions to the ECJ in the framework of the appeal in Sabam v Tiscali (which was well reported at the time it was issued in 2007; an English translation is available here). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:44 am
Freeze has stated on their blog: “Ironically, Bingham McCutchen knew their arbitration agreement, as originally drafted, was invalid in light of a 2009 Massachusetts Supreme Court opinion: Warfield v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
The legitimacy of presidential constitutionalism is frequently debated, most recently in the context of President Obama’s refusal to defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm
In Sarah Milov’s paper, “Clearing the Air: Shimp v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
Brooks v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:22 pm
The court found that the State Trooper was involved in a governmental function at the time of the accident since she was working a separate accident at the time. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 10:59 am
Dan Markel (Florida State University College of Law) has posted How Should Punitive Damages Work? [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 1:50 pm
City of Westfield v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:22 pm
" If this works, the witness may now testify based upon his refreshed recollection but may not red the... [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:25 pm
This article looks to review the work that has been done since that time. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:33 pm
This was the case in Mitchell v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:40 am
Supreme Court decision Windsor v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
Doggett v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:37 pm
--Christou v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
If the exclusion worked by Exclusion Order No. 34 were of that nature, the Hirabayashi case would be authority for sustaining it. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
If the exclusion worked by Exclusion Order No. 34 were of that nature, the Hirabayashi case would be authority for sustaining it. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
If the exclusion worked by Exclusion Order No. 34 were of that nature, the Hirabayashi case would be authority for sustaining it. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:48 pm
August 15, 2011), the Second Circuit affirmed a district court decision and held that the first sale doctrine does not apply to copyrighted works produced outside of the United States – in this instance, lawfully manufactured textbooks – that are subsequently imported and resold in the United States. [read post]
