Search for: "v. "
Results 5821 - 5840
of 493,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2021, 3:06 pm
The F/V MAGNUS MARTENS was working in the Bering Sea when the accident occurred. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:17 am
Regina v Dobson [2011] EWCA Crim 1256; [2011] WLR (D) 167 “Where the Court of Appeal was considering, for the purposes of quashing an acquittal, whether there was new and compelling evidence, provided the new evidence was reliable, substantial and appeared to be highly probative it would be compelling for the purposes of section 78 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: otherwise it would not. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:16 am
Regina v Lancaster [2010] EWCA Crim 370; [2010] WLR (D) 63 “Where a person was charged with an offence of falsifying a document made or required for an accounting purpose, by omitting a material particular from that document, contrary to s 17 of the Theft Act 1968, the omitted particular was to be regarded as material if it had the effect that the document was liable to mislead in a way which was significant, or in a way which mattered. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:46 am
Berezovsky v Abramovich [2011] EWCA Civ 153; [2011] WLR (D) 59 “A claimant who applied for permission to amend his particulars of claim by reframing the loss allegedly suffered as a result of the commission of a tort was not seeking to make a new claim involving the addition or substitution of a new cause of action within the meaning of section 35 of the Limitation Act 1980. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:22 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan held Jan. 22 (Romantics v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:53 am
An important decision has been rendered by the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in Beck v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:53 am
An important decision has been rendered by the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in Beck v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:51 am
Regina v Miller [2010] EWCA Crim 1153; [2010] WLR (D) 142 “In criminal proceedings, the circumstances in which one party would be permitted pursuant to s 100(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to ask a witness a question in cross-examination with a view to eliciting an answer implicating that witness in bad behaviour, which behaviour that party would be otherwise unable to prove, were infrequent and limited in scope. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:49 am
Regina v Braithwaite [2010] EWCA Crim 1082; [2010] WLR (D) 141 “Material contained in police crime reports that unproven allegations had been made against a person who was someone other than a defendant, or that that person had been investigated in respect of an offence, would rarely be of substantial probative value to an issue at trial sufficient to render it admissible as evidence of bad character against that person pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:17 am
Last summer, we blogged about Kamakahi v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:54 am
Some time ago I called Wyndham v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
In a recent decision Ward v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:08 am
Sears v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 6:59 pm
In a recent appellate court case Trivedi v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
I hadn't noticed until today that the Army Litigation Division lawyer who is "of counsel" for the United States in the Gray v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
In a recent decision Ward v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:18 pm
In the recent decision of U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 12:00 am
On March 25, in a 2-1 opinion in Smith v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:07 pm
Judge Hayes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California today issued this ruling on the dispositive motions in Martin v. [read post]
