Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 5841 - 5860
of 95,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
In reviewing the Plaintiff’s Complaint, the note noted that the additional allegations presented by the Plaintiff were simply boilerplate allegations that the Defendant was inattentive and going too fast, all of which allegations the court found only amounted to a classic claim of negligence, and not recklessness. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
For all orders in relation to Ajay Monga v Red Chilli Entertainment Ltd. see here. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
Our Suffolk Estate Litigation Attorneys at Stephen Bilkis and Associates can represent your case, and will provide you with all the legal options available in Court. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:51 am
It therefore dismissed all of the claims, except for that of the first named plaintiff, without prejudice. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:51 am
It therefore dismissed all of the claims, except for that of the first named plaintiff, without prejudice. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:26 pm
The Court thus found that all four of the implied-right-of-action factors weighed in favor of recognizing such a claim for miscalculation of presentence credits. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:24 am
" Plaintiff Cummins Ltd. claims to own all right, title and interest in both patents. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:47 am
State legislation signed into law on January 15, 2009, and made applicable for a period of four months prior to its effective date, provided that all unclaimed deposits accruing during the designated four month period, which previously had been retained by the plaintiffs, henceforth must be paid to the state. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 7:32 pm
In all, she detailed forty-two alleged incidents from October 2005 until September 2010, noting that the list was not exhaustive. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:15 am
Eventually the city moved to dismiss the case, but not before plaintiffs incurred significant legal expenses, The court said in part:The City’s Code could not be more clear: Under a plain reading of the Order in conjunction with the Ordinance, all expressive activity was excluded from the mask or distance mandate because such conduct was not explicitly addressed in the Order itself. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
As such, the Defendant’s Preliminary Objections were sustained the Plaintiff’s allegations of recklessness, reckless conduct, as well as the Plaintiff's request for punitive damages, were all stricken from the Complaint. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm
These and other cases make plain that the First Amendment does not shield all decisions by religious institutions, whether or employment-related or otherwise, from review. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 4:05 am
It is at this last step of the analysis that the last of Plaintiff’s remaining claims against the Holy See — negligence, negligent training, supervision, and retention, and violations of customary international law, all pursuant to respondeat superior based on the alleged actions of its putative employees— fail....Case-law is clear that decisions related to employment and supervision are exactly the kind of policy judgments that the discretionary exclusion was… [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:33 am
Judge Broderick reasoned that the issues in the IPR – the validity of the patents-in-suit – were unrelated to the parties’ contract, and in fact could have been raised essentially by any third party not at all involved in the contract. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
Judge Bell reviewed in detail all the evidence submitted by the parties, including the dictionary definitions, usage by competitors and others in the field, media reference, plaintiff's own usage, press releases, business references, social media, and consumer surveys. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:46 pm
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
” ...By Plaintiffs’ own admission, their claims at this stage of the litigation are dependent on their allegation that Defendants did not bring legal challenges against development projects that were, other than not being run by members of the Hasidic community, similar to Kiryas Radin in all material respects.The court however concluded that the non-Hasidic development projects which were not challenged were not similar to Kiryas Radin. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 12:19 pm
Defendant Wrightspeed contended that federal-question jurisdiction was proper and asked that the federal court in the Southern District of Indiana hear and decide all further matters in the litigation. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
The court additionally noted that, even though the Plaintiff did not sign a waiver on the date of the injury, the Plaintiff had previously signed a waiver while using the same facility, and that waiver was clearly and unequivocally binding for “all time thereafter. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Employers with operations in California should take note, however, that while SB 292 is aimed at overturning the decision in Kelley, it goes beyond that decision as it encompasses all types of sexual harassment, same-sex as well as different-sex. [read post]
