Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 15,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 7:27 am
In the context of a claim brought under a federal statute, the common-law doctrine may be applied to bar recovery only where (1) the plaintiff bears at least substantially equal responsibility for the violations he or she seeks to redress; and (2) preclusion of the suit would not substantially interfere with the statute’s policy goals, according to the Supreme Court’s discussion of the doctrine in a 1985 securities law case, Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s 5-4 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 10:22 am
In yesterday’s Glass v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:15 am
Last Term, the Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Oct. 14, 2008) (reducing punitive damages award to comply with due process requirements of the United States Constitution); Anderson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
That simple and logical proposition was too much for this panel to bear, however, because of the societal “value” it perceived in the information at stake (i.e., tracing immigrants). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
Belship Navigation, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Bear Stearns andamp; Co., 484 F. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:15 pm
J M v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:05 am
Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
Second, in 2001, in Circuit City Stores v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:55 pm
Part I briefly reviews the doctrine of Barron v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:29 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
First, in Meacham v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:18 am
House of Representatives in support of the respondents in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
In Mohamoud v RB Kensington and Chelsea and Saleem v Wandsworth LBC [2015] EWCA Civ 780, the Court of Appeal were faced with the difficult argument about the interaction between section 11, Children Act 2004 and possession proceedings brought by a local authority against unsuccessful applicants for homelessness assistance. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:53 am
Next, it asked him when he came to the United States, and he answered that he had arrived 10 years previously. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
The gun owners argued that the rule violated their right to “keep and bear arms” under the Constitution’s Second Amendment. [read post]
