Search for: "Birth v. Birth" Results 5841 - 5860 of 7,194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by Legal Beagle
SCOTTISH POLICE have now lost the ability to question suspects without their solicitor being present, after the UK’s Supreme Court in London finally issued its ruling today on the Appeal case of Cadder (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland), throwing out the practice in Scotland of being able to question suspects without a solicitor in attendance as being a violation of Human Rights laws.The background to the case : The Appellant was detained by the police… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:34 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: As several scholars have noted, the Supreme Court’s Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:02 am
His application was initially rejected by the Commission because of Fiffe’s date of birth but it was subsequently accepted and processed. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:39 am
Most animals, however, will be tagged, but, even among these, some will lose their tags somewhere between the birthing pen and the slaughter house floor. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Matthew Hill
In R (Gurung) v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWHC 1496 (Admin), the grounds of review were irrationality and age discrimination. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am by INFORRM
  The relationship and the birth of X were in the public domain. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
  (Using proper birth control might be Lesson #2.) [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 2:24 am by INFORRM
  On Friday 8 October 2010 in the High Court in Dublin, Mr Justice Nicholas Kearns gave judgment in the case of Hickey v Sunday World. [read post]