Search for: "California Law Review" Results 5841 - 5860 of 29,301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
  California law mandates that employers must provide injured workers with these critical forms within 24 hours of learning about the injury. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:35 pm by Unknown
Nakomidizo: An Anishinaabe law response to two-hundred years of Johnson v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:30 am by admin
The California Superior Court handed down the final order in a closely watched lawsuit brought by environmental justice advocates that accused CARB of not complying with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) when it adopted a “scoping plan’’ to implement the state’s climate change law in 2008. [read post]
The post Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
The post Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
The post Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
They recommended that states repeal certificate-of-need laws to provide better health care options. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 1:36 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
District Court for the Northern District of California issued two rullings in Jahi McMath's federal lawsuit against the State of California and Alameda County. [read post]
The case names of the newest decisions start with Section 3 and are denoted by bold italic fonts. 2019 CEQA UPDATE  To read the 2019 cumulative CEQA review, click here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2020/01/articles/ceqa/2019-ceqa-4th-quarter-review/ CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Advance alert: Testimonial Exclusions and Religious Freedom in Early America, by Jud Campbell, University of Richmond School of Law, is now available from Law and History Review. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Flake, Interactive Religious Accommodations, 71 Alabama Law Review 67-114 (2019).Robin Fretwell Wilson, Common Ground Lawmaking: Lessons for Peaceful Coexistence from Masterpiece Cakeshop and the Utah Compromise, 51 Connecticut Law Review 483-574 (2019).Kermit V. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by Unknown
Immigration Policy," Migration Information Source, 30 March 2023 [text]"Guilty After Proven Innocent: Hidden Factfinding in Immigration Decisionmaking," California Law Review (Forthcoming, 2024) [preprint]"Impact on Medical Students Participating in Forensic Examinations of Asylum Seekers: A Pilot Study," Journal of Student-Run Clinics, vol. 9, no. 1 (2023) [open access]"Noncitizen Harboring and the Freedom of Association," North Carolina… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:15 pm by Unknown
Policies and Practices are Controlling the Border Narrative at the Expense of Asylum Seekers," California Western International Law Journal, vol. 50, no. 1 (2020) [full-text]"The Case Against Prosecuting Refugees," Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 115 (Forthcoming, 2020) [full-text]"COVID-19, Wall Building, and the Effects on Migrant Protection Protocols by the Trump Administration: The Spectacle of the Worsening Human Rights… [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:35 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
  But Zeltzer hopes that you will tap the plus button at the top right of the Index screen to purchase additional state law, right now from California, Florida, Illinois, New York and Texas, or additional titles of the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Janet Brewer
Less than 1% of all California lawyers are certified as specialists in Estate Planning. [read post]
  Businesses will have to review the scope of these rights carefully to identify what information may be subject to employee review and what information may fall under an exemption. [read post]