Search for: "Crawford"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 6,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 5:26 pm
In her post about the Hein oral argument, Jan Crawford Greenburg included an interesting observation. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:08 pm
"Faith & frailty": Jan Crawford Greenburg has this interesting post today at her "Legalities" blog. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 3:23 pm
As suggested here, and by commentors, it is not easy for sentencing fans to reader Bockting's discussion of Crawford's non-retroactivity under Teague and wonder what this all might mean for Apprendi and/or Blakely. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:52 pm
"Part II of Confirm Them's three-part Q&A session with Jan Crawford Greenburg": Available online at this link. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
Here is what Jan Crawford Greenburg, who was in attendance at the oral arguments, had to say...Chief Justice Roberts really ran the show, completely directing the argument against taxpayer standing-and even stepped in a couple of times to help Solicitor General Paul Clement explain why the atheist group, Freedom from Religion Foundation, had no legal right to sue. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:19 pm
The Supreme Court's 2004 decision Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 1:10 pm
Steven Crawford was a young black man in trouble with the law after the racial unrest of the late 1960s.Like Laughman, Gladden appears to be mentally challenged. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 1:02 pm
Over at ConfirmThem, Jan Crawford Greenburg is doing a very interesting Q&A (part 1 here, part 2 here, part 3 coming soon) that includes the following:... [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:01 pm
"The Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that its major ruling on the Confrontation Clause in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:28 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled Wednesday that its earlier decision in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:02 am
and holding that Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:22 am
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion on behalf of a unanimous Court, holding that "Crawford announced a 'new rule' of criminal procedure and that this rule does not fall within the Teague exception for watershed rules. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:11 am
"Crawford ruling not retroactive": Lyle Denniston at "SCOTUSblog" has a post that begins, "The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Wednesday that its major ruling on the Confrontation Clause in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:05 am
I am sure folks eager to seek Crawford wreck havoc with old convictions are disappointed with this outcome. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:03 am
Crawford, it found, meets neither test. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 6:45 am
I'm on vacation but Ive just found out that the Supreme Court held today in the Whorton case that Crawford isn't retroactive. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:45 pm
-Bridget Crawford [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Mahoney's name is in the air again, as a result of this interview with Jan Crawford Greenburg, author of the recently published, and acclaimed, book, Supreme Conflict . [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
Crawford had pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:30 pm
Crawford, (Del. [read post]
