Search for: "Crawford "
Results 5841 - 5860
of 6,160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
When I argue Crawford to trial judges, some of them seem to prefer the old pre-Crawford days. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:13 pm
Judge Crawford concurred in part and dissented in part. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 1:11 pm
Bockting yesterday, announcing that the rule in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 9:52 am
Bockting (05-595) decided:"Crawford announced a new rule of criminal procedure that does not fall within the Teague exception for watershed rules. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 9:01 am
Bockton yesterday, announcing that the rule in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
(For more on the case and the oral argument, see the discussions at SCOTUS Blog and Jan Crawford Greenberg's Legalities.).Because of a 1968 case, Flast v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:33 pm
"Best Selling Author Speculates on Justice Ginsburg Health, Possible Court Vacancy; Describes her As 'Not a Justice Ginsburg that I have seen before'": The organization Fidelis has today posted online this podcast interview [34MB mp3 file] with ABC News correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:26 pm
In her post about the Hein oral argument, Jan Crawford Greenburg included an interesting observation. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:08 pm
"Faith & frailty": Jan Crawford Greenburg has this interesting post today at her "Legalities" blog. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 3:23 pm
As suggested here, and by commentors, it is not easy for sentencing fans to reader Bockting's discussion of Crawford's non-retroactivity under Teague and wonder what this all might mean for Apprendi and/or Blakely. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:52 pm
"Part II of Confirm Them's three-part Q&A session with Jan Crawford Greenburg": Available online at this link. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
Here is what Jan Crawford Greenburg, who was in attendance at the oral arguments, had to say...Chief Justice Roberts really ran the show, completely directing the argument against taxpayer standing-and even stepped in a couple of times to help Solicitor General Paul Clement explain why the atheist group, Freedom from Religion Foundation, had no legal right to sue. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:19 pm
The Supreme Court's 2004 decision Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 1:10 pm
Steven Crawford was a young black man in trouble with the law after the racial unrest of the late 1960s.Like Laughman, Gladden appears to be mentally challenged. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 1:02 pm
Over at ConfirmThem, Jan Crawford Greenburg is doing a very interesting Q&A (part 1 here, part 2 here, part 3 coming soon) that includes the following:... [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:01 pm
"The Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that its major ruling on the Confrontation Clause in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:28 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled Wednesday that its earlier decision in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:02 am
and holding that Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:22 am
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion on behalf of a unanimous Court, holding that "Crawford announced a 'new rule' of criminal procedure and that this rule does not fall within the Teague exception for watershed rules. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:11 am
"Crawford ruling not retroactive": Lyle Denniston at "SCOTUSblog" has a post that begins, "The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Wednesday that its major ruling on the Confrontation Clause in Crawford v. [read post]
