Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 16,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 11:54 am
The Strasbourg Court has ruled in Öztürk v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:31 am
You’re representing a defendant in a domestic violence case, and comes time to cross-examine the alleged victim, you’re loaded for bear. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
DPF v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:23 am
Co. v Ballinger, 303 AD2d 503, 504; see Insurance Law § 5217; State Farm Mut. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 6:28 pm
Neither the conceal and carry law, nor the state’s Self-Defense Act, nor any other law cited by the pharmacist provided the basis for a public policy exception to his at-will employment (Hoven v Walgreen Co, June 2, 2014, Moore, K). [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has repeatedly stated or suggested in its recent decisions in Berrier v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:11 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari (08-1332) Brief in opposition (08-1332; 08-1472) Petitioner's reply (08-1332) Conditional cross-petition for certiorari (08-1472) Response to conditional cross-petition for certiorari (08-1472) Reply of cross-petitioners (08-1472) Amicus brief of the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties Docket: 09-274 Title: Ryan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:47 am
He was arraigned six hours later, and in State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:21 am
Earlier today, in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
International Law/Class Actions: Act of State Doctrine; Customary International LawNevsun Resources Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
Jacobitti v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:17 am
The husband stated that he crossed out the clause more than a year after he and his wife signed the agreement, knowing that "the modification was absolutely unenforceable. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:03 am
There have been volumes written about cross examining expert witnesses. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 8:30 am
Marshall v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:16 am
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 11:53 am
The defendants relied on evidence given by the claimant in cross-examination accepting that all Guild members either expressly state membership or use the claimant’s logo to convey membership. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
