Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 6,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2009, 1:20 pm
District Judge Adalberto Jordan's decision of September 29 in Langbehn v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
AstraZeneca pointed to the long-felt need for such a drug, because the use of clozapine was severely limited and no suitable replacement was available in the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
United States Issue: Whether the federal "honest services" fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:44 am
THE COEUR ALASKA CASE The last time we saw Coeur Alaska, the company had just won their case before the United States Supreme Court and could fill a lake with sludge from their mining operations. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
The American movie, as well as software and music, industries estimate that Chinese pirated goods cost the United States industry over $2 billion in sales per year. [25] In April 2009, more than 100,000 Chinese-made counterfeit items were seized in Bay Bridge, Brooklyn, leading to an arrest and second-degree trademark counterfeit charge. [26] With items easily shipped out of China to the United States,… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:17 am
Focusing on some of the original concerns - for example, the need for further domestic implementation by Canada (and not, to the same degree, by the United States), the need for spending legislation, and the provision of criminal penalties - unsettles not only the understanding of the Supreme Court's decision, but also more recent critiques of the doctrines with which it has long been associated. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
In addition to her contribution to that 1st trial before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, we noted,Des Forges also gave expert testimony in national courts, the United Nations, the Organization of African Unity, and the national legislatures of Belgium, France, and the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 1:12 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:47 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
United States, 249 U.S. 47, 52 (1919), “[T]he character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:27 am
Oberg; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT;2009 U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
Citing more cases from the 19th Century than an opinion by Justice Scalia, United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:40 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:45 am
” The Court in Boumediene “made clear that its decision was dependent on the extraordinary nature of the United States presence in Guantanamo. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:30 pm
See Miller, 335 F.3d at 899; United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:35 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
In LaMasa v. [read post]
