Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 21,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 3:34 am
Co., 13 AD3d at 174-175, 787 N.Y.S.2d 15). [**4] We reject the contention of the Hiscock attorneys that the principle of equitable subrogation does not apply because American has not yet paid the loss of its insured (see Allianz Underwriters Ins. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, National Association, EMC Mortgage Services, LLC and John Does 1-10. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:50 am
Department of Justice: the right to keep guns does not include a corollary right to acquire guns. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 11:16 am
(2) For the purpose of any civil investigation which, in the opinion of the Attorney General, is necessary and proper to enforce this section, the Attorney General or his designee are empowered to administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses, take evidence, and require the production of any books, papers, or other documents which the Attorney General deems relevant or material to such investigation. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:10 am
Why does this happen? [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:41 pm
If you are the Attorney General of Florida, two out of six may not be bad. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Defendant’s assertion that he was reviewing the invoices is too general to defeat the claim (see Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500, 501 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 702 [2 [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:00 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:24 am
As the classes sought are nationwide and if plaintiffs can establish the commonality of an overall corporate practice to not pay overtime and/or falsify records, this class has the capacity to generate, literally, millions of dollars in exposure and (requested) attorneys fees. [read post]
10 Sep 2006, 3:48 pm
The Superior Court affirmed.In Cooper v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
Graphic Management Associates, Inc (Docket Report) Merely being a ‘sophisticated company’ does not impute an ‘intent to deceive’ for false marking claim: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
The statute also does not revise the general evidentiary rules on admissibility. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
The statute also does not revise the general evidentiary rules on admissibility. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:58 am
Milkovich v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:31 am
Mashberg v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Courts have generally held that Title VII does not apply to unpaid interns, meaning that they cannot assert claims for sexual harassment under that statute. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:33 pm
(7) Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
Lozano v. [read post]
