Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 13,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 8:12 pm
Under intermediate scrutiny, Mendon was required to show that its interest in crime deterrence is substantial, and that its restriction on expressive activity is narrowly tailored to advance that interest without at the same time banning or significantly restricting a substantial quantity of speech that does not create the evils the city seeks to eliminate. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm
So if you forget to date it, does your vote still count? [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:35 am
Logistical problems that should be considered: 1) What is the significance of what I would call the patchwork problem? [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm
That observation does not end our analysis, however. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:55 pm
" The court allowed the plaintiffs to go ahead with their intentional interference with prospective business relationship claim, which has as its elements, "(1) a business relationship between the plaintiff and another party; (2) the defendant's intentiona [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 10:50 am
[5] Hirschman, supra note 1 [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
For corporate firms with 1 to over 5,000 employees, the overall percentage was 29%. although percentages ranged from 17.6% for firms with 1 to 9 employees to 37.7% with firms with 500 to 4,999 employees. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
Since independent claim 1 does not contain these features it does not meet the requirement following from A 84 taken in combination with R 29(1) and (3) that any independent claim must contain all the technical features essential to the definition of the invention. (6) Claim 3 is not fully supported by the description as required by A 84, as its scope is broader than justified by the description. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Last month, Righthaven finally had its day before the Ninth Circuit when it participated in oral arguments in two of its appeals (audio available here).1 These appeals almost didn’t happen. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:52 pm
Does Extending Credit to Unauthorized Aliens Violate Federal Law? [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Federal law doesn’t regulate the mining of uranium, but it does regulate uranium processing and the handling of the tailings left over afterwards. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
It stated, insofar as is relevant here,`1. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:00 am
Does 1-11, a "John Doe" case targeting University of Maine students. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
§ 28-1-105(a). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:59 am
Francois Pochart, Thierry Lautier and Lionel MartinThe PACTE law of May 22nd[1] introduced new opposition proceedings against French patents before the French PTO. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Presumably, Beth does not need a degree to teach ballet, so the learned professional exemption does not apply. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to… [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
This does not amount to determination. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
These minutes of the ED have to be considered as the first communication within the meaning of R 86(3), first sentence, EPC 1973, with regard to these objections, and hence, claim 1 according to the second auxiliary request filed with letter of 29 May 2007 being an attempt to overcome the objections made in these minutes, there is no room to refuse these claims under R 86(3), second sentence, EPC 1973. [read post]
