Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 7,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 4:49 pm
The case is Ashcroft v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
In the recent case of G.D. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
You thought they meant it in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:43 am
This is a legal distinction which is well-known to English lawyers. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:16 pm
In a Californian case, Moreno v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm
The association also challenges the company’s characterization of the association as a “sophisticated” party, observing that all members are foreign and English is a second language for most. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front: United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
Second, the Supreme Court will in the near future decide a case on the subject of compensation for miscarriage of justice in the case of R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 11:01 pm
Ahmed & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 184 (25 February 2011) – Read judgment “Torture is wrong”. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
ICC (1990), and First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Times v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 10:43 am
MGM Studios v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
We are discussing Morrison v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
It is obviously not a specifically English or UK issue. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:22 am
We knew that the English and the French do not drive on the same side of the road. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:41 am
They had a five-minute conference before the trial but the lawyer spoke only limited English and the interpreter had not been present. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm
The latter was the older rule in a case from the early 1980s, People v. [read post]
