Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 5841 - 5860 of 6,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2015, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court grouped the employee’s communications with supervisors into broad categories and granted summary judgment on the ground that most of those categories were not statutorily protected types of communications. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:11 am
Granting the motion against the City alone, the district court ordered the City to pay nominal damages of one dollar and issued an injunction regarding future training of police officers. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am by Bryn Miller
 Given that the Court has already notified the parties it is seriously considering granting the petition,18 in our view, there is a good chance that the Court will extend the deadlines for redistricting at the state level. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:01 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Bre-Ex Ltd., the Ontario Superior Court recently held that by adopting arbitral rules which preclude an appeal, the parties thereby opt out of statutory appeal rights. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of DEI Films v Tiwari 2018 ONSC 4423 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action under Ontario’s anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:15 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also granted the franchisee’s motion to dismiss the applicant’s IIED claim against it because she failed to plausibly allege vicarious liability under the theory of respondeat superior. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:58 am by Jonathan Holbrook
[…] Thus the judgments of conviction based on the involuntary pleas of guilty are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:59 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Although Bluford was a controversial decision, the California Supreme Court declined to grant the employer’s petition for review. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:24 am by Susan Brenner
”’ Later that day at 4:54 P.M., Juror B posted again: `Superior Court in Brockton picks me . . . for the trail[ sic ]. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
App. - Amarillo 1969, no writ) the court found that cosmetics were necessaries and in Jarvis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If the court grants injunctive or declaratory relief, the person, business, or association responsible for the violation shall be required to pay reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs …. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
These are analogous powers that the English Superior Courts had under the prerogative writs of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus and quo-warranto. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Question: Your title (like mine) comes from the Supreme Court’s 1968 opinion in Tinker v. [read post]