Search for: "Green v. State" Results 5841 - 5860 of 6,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am by INFORRM
We also learn that Sir Philip Green, the perennial Pantomime villain, is also guilty of using his legally obtained wealth to legally purchase property using legal means of doing so. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm by John McFarland
The Supreme Court’s majority opinion is by Justice Green, joined by Justices Lehrmann, Devine, Blacklock and Brown. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am by Betty Lupinacci
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:11 am
" Kappos further stated that "first-action allowance is up something like 600%" under this pilot program. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
By way of example, there is already OHIM case law relating to designs used on toy cars as opposed to real cars (Supermarked A/S v Ferrari SPA, ICD 842, 13 November 2006), as well as a decision of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales relating to a design that can function as both a laundry aid, and a massage device (Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors [2008] EWCA 358). [read post]
12 May 2019, 5:06 am by INFORRM
” This exclusion is nowhere stated in the White Paper. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
These browsewrap agreements sometimes state that mere use of the website constitutes assent to the terms and conditions. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm by centerforartlaw
On the morning of the hearing, Kirsha Kaechele led twenty-five women dressed in navy power suits, pearls, and red lipstick into the courtroom.[28] In a blog post, the artist describes how they “moved in silent synchronicity, crossing and uncrossing their pantyhosed legs [pause], leaning forward in their navy suits [pause], peering over their tortoiseshell spectacles [pause], and applying lipstick” for two hours straight.[29] Even the judge noted their behavior in his ruling,… [read post]
The SEC stated that “the Commission will hold investment advisers accountable when they do not accurately describe their incorporation of ESG factors into their investment selection process. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
But to be effective these ought to focus on targeted states rather than on the modalities of leading state self-actualization. [read post]