Search for: "Held v. State" Results 5841 - 5860 of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am by Richard A. Epstein
Cruikshank, in which the Court held that enforcement of the criminal code was to be left to the states themselves, even those with thoroughly corrupt racial politics. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
Referring to his earlier judgment in the Technical Fibre case [2010] EWPCC 011, HHJ Birss noted that he had held that:"the new procedures in CPR Pt 45.41 – Pt 45.43 and corresponding section 25C of the Costs Practice Direction; CPR Pt 63, Section V Patents County Court, consisting of CPR Pt 63.17 – 63.26; and Section V of the Practice Direction 63 – Intellectual Property Claims paragraphs 27 – 31, did not apply to existing cases. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm by William Birdthistle
  Two years ago, the Court launched a thousand law review articles on this topic with its decision in Stoneridge v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:03 pm
And the Court had previously held that the statute was unambiguous in Hicks v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:34 pm
The main body of the Geneva Conventions do not apply to U.S. citizens held by the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm by Rantanen
  The argument was held before a full courtroom, with former Deputy Solicitor General Thomas G. [read post]